Do the premises connect to each other?
YES → What's the valid inference from the combination? Use that to evaluate the conclusion.
NO → Think about each premise separately when evaluating support for the conclusion.
Note: No gaps in Parallel Reasoning (gaps = Parallel Flaw)
Write the argument pattern in abstract terms — nothing to do with the actual content.
Example: "All A are B. X is A. Therefore, X is B."
DO NOT SKIP THIS. If you struggle here, it will be worse in the answer choices.
Based on your abstract structure, what can you quickly scan for?
Shallow dip = quick scan before committing to a full read
For each answer: Shallow dip first. If markers exist, read piece by piece and predict what comes next.
If an answer matches your structure/flaw:
• Select it and move on
• Don't second-guess — saves significant time